This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McKendry, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by McKendry, R. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Postgraduate: academic
Right arrow Taking exams
Right arrow Other family medicine
Right arrow Rural Health and Medicine
CMAJ • February 20, 2001; 164 (4)
© 2001 Canadian Medical Association or its licensors

Letters
Correspondance

Remote versus urban medical training

Robert J. McKendry

Professor of Medicine Faculty of Medicine University of Ottawa Ottawa, Ont.

Russell MacDonald raises 2 important issues concerning rural practice not addressed in our study: maintenance of skills and scope of (rural) practice, and practice location.1 Perhaps, in the future, maintenance of skills and scope of practice could be evaluated using the results of the relevant and validated recertification process. A career tracking study of the graduates of the 2 family medicine training programs in northern Ontario suggested that approximately 50% to 70% of graduates begin practice in a rural or remote setting. In comparison, only 4–14% of all graduates of Ontario medical schools practice in a rural or remote location.2 Incomplete responses from graduates of family medicine training programs and a lack of standard definitions for terms such as "rural" and "retention" are among the problems encountered in researching an accurate answer to this important question.

William Eaton was disappointed that our description of the rural training programs was limited to 2 sentences contrasting urban and rural teaching settings. This information was sacrificed to stay within the prescribed word limits. We will put Eaton in touch with the directors of the 2 rural training programs in northern Ontario for a more informed description of the programs.

References

  1. McKendry RJ, Busing N, Dauphinee DW, Brailovsky CA, Boulais A-P. Does the site of postgraduate family medicine training predict performance on summative examinations? A comparison of urban and remote programs. CMAJ 2000;163(6):708-11.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. McKendry R. Physicians for Ontario: too many, too few for 2000 and beyond. Report to the Ontario Minstrity of Health and Long-Term Care. Toronto: The Ministry; 1999. p. 52



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 BMJHome page
Minerva
BMJ, September 5, 2002; (2002) 1050006.
[Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McKendry, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by McKendry, R. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Postgraduate: academic
Right arrow Taking exams
Right arrow Other family medicine
Right arrow Rural Health and Medicine